Check the numbers.
The sample client from the home page — age 74, New York, an $18M estate today — examined in full. Where the tax goes, the same decade charted with and without the plan, and what the optimizer makes of it.
The installment sale is worth one and three-quarters of everything else.
The whole bar is the $11,335,868 this estate owes with no planning. The installment sale removes $5,505,131 of it; the other five strategies remove $3,135,076 between them — a ratio of 1.76 to 1. What is left, $2,695,661, is the tax the finished plan still pays.
- QPRT$1,231,800 · 10.9%
- Annual gifting$348,421 · 3.1%
- Discounted gifting$149,324 · 1.3%
- Life insurance trust$218,909 · 1.9%
- Rolling GRATs$1,186,622 · 10.5%
- Installment sale$5,505,131 · 48.5%
- Estate tax that survives$2,695,661 · 23.8%
Thirty-six percent, or nine.
One client, one ten-year horizon, modeled twice. The red is estate tax — federal above, New York below it. Everything else is what reaches the family.
- Federal estate tax
- New York estate tax
- Investments
- Residence
- Gift trust
- Installment sale trust
- Rolling GRAT
- GRAT remainder
- QPRT
- Life insurance
Both rates divide by $31,601,186 — the estate net of the $600,000 insurance benefit — so only the tax moves between them.
Both charts assume the lifetime exemption is halved in 2030. That is a dial, not a forecast — pick any year, any percentage, or leave it alone. Plans get built against what might happen, not only against what is written today.
The optimizer’s full run.
The optimizer searches every combination of strategies inside the limits you set, then reports what it found. Including when the plan you were about to recommend dips below the liquidity floor you set, nine years out.
Run your own numbers on a real client.
Two weeks, full access to the platform.
Start your free trialOr call us at (727) 442-1200, Monday to Friday, 9am–5pm Eastern.